Legal Opinion
State v. Pearson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 11, 2001No. CX-01-361, C3-01-363PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge
The trial court sustained the revocation of appellant Steven James Pearson’s driver’s license in an implied consent hearing, and Pearson was convicted and sentenced for driving with an alcohol concentration over .10 in a criminal trial based on stipulated facts. Pearson appealed both the implied consent and criminal cases and the appeals were consolidated. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 20, 2000, a Lac Qui Parle County sheriffs deputy stopped and arrested Pearson for driving under the influence. The deputy read Pearson the implied consent advisory, and Pearson agreed to a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. FlermoenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. KjesethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006