People v. Curry
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
It is the rare initiative that does not have at least one ambiguity, or omission, or some other difficulty that only emerges following passage by the voters and courts begin to wrestle with its actual implementation. Even so, Proposition 47 must win some sort of prize for taking a single subject and proving such a fertile engine of sustained controversy and evolving confusion fully 18 months after its enactment. Its influence has even clouded the scope and operation of Proposition 36, a measure adopted two years earlier.
So it may seem odd in a case presenting a novel issue…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. AdelmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. BastidasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. AdelmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Le CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2016