Legal Opinion

Snoffer v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1935No. Civ. 8802PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff sued for damage to real property which he alleged was caused by the act of the defendant city in changing the grade of La Brea Avenue. He had judgment upon the verdict of a jury for $300, and thereafter moved for a new trial. This motion was granted and the defendant appeals from the judgment and from the order granting the new trial.

The motion for new trial was made upon the grounds of:

“1. Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict of the jury, in that the evidence adduced at the trial related to the question of damages to plaintiff herein on June 1,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Emery v. San Francisco Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People v. FindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. AzoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Rosenberg v. Geo. A. Moore & Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Sala v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sopp v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Snoffer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. People v. VisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Wood v. Alves Service Transportation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Phipps v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API