Legal Opinion
People v. Vis
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 20, 1966No. Crim. 11877PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHANTRY, J. pro tern. *
The question presented is whether appellant was a “contractor” within the purview of sections 7028 and 7026 of the Business and Professions Code.
Appellant was convicted in the municipal court of the charge that he did “wilfully and unlawfully engage in the business of and act in the capacity of a contractor, without then and there having a license obtained from the Contractors’ State License Board of the State of California authorizing him so to do,” in violation of section 7028 of the Business and Professions Code.
Upon appeal to the Appellate Department of the Superior…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Associated Independent Owner-Operators, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- People v. FairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Jackson v. PancakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.