Knogo Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge
The court is presented here with a procedural snarl not uncommon in patent cases but unique on its facts in this instance. Plaintiff, Knogo Corporation, with the signed consent of defendant, filed a stipulation on April 17, 1981, under Rule 102(a)(l)(ii) to dismiss this action with prejudice. It is not stated in the stipulation but it is an uncontested fact that the stipulation results from a settlement agreement between Knogo and the United States pursuant to which Knogo agrees to pay defendant its costs and attorney fees in the amount of $15,000. The issue now is whether the court should…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Somali Development Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Berdick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lemelson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Orion Scientific Systems v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Thornton-Trump v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Kola Nut Travel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022