Legal Opinion
Orion Scientific Systems v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 8, 1993No. 93-350CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINSTEIN, Judge.
Opinion
The court has denied the motion to intervene as a defendant, as of right or, in the alternative, permissively, by Eagle Research Group, Inc. (Eagle). See order of June 25, 1993. This opinion explains the reasons for the denial of that motion.
Basically, Eagle’s motion to intervene as a defendant as a matter of right pursuant to rule 24 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) has been denied because this court possesses no jurisdiction to hear or decide claims between private parties, e.g., between plaintiff and Eagle, and Eagle has no claim…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Anderson Columbia Environmental, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Chippewa Cree Tribe of Rocky Boy's Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Bird v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- United Keetoowah Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007