Legal Opinion

Chittenden Trust Co. v. Andre Noel Sports

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 4, 1992No. 91-449PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an interlocutory appeal from two superior court orders, one granting summary judgment in favor of defendant debtors and guarantors as to whether plaintiff Chittenden Trust Company (CTC) has the right to obtain a deficiency judgment following its failure to provide notice of the sale of repossessed collateral, and the other dismissing remaining claims that sought damages based on, among other things, allegations that defendants fraudulently transferred some of the collateral after they had defaulted on their loan. We affirm the court’s refusal to allow CTC a deficiency judgment, but…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Greathouse v. Charter National Bank-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wilmington Trust Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. Emmons v. BurkettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. Chittenden Trust Co. v. MaryanskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. Sedalia Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. v. Loges Farms, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carr v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Federal Financial Co. v. PapadopoulosSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. In Re KingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  5. Klein v. Wolf Run Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API