Legal Opinion
Emmons v. Burkett
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 19, 1987No. 43794PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the Court • of Appeals correctly concluded that the appellee creditor, who had sold a small portion of the debtor’s collateral without the notice required by OCGA § 11-9-504 (3), was not barred from obtaining an in personam judgment against or selling the other collateral of the debtor. Emmons v. Burkett, 179 Ga. App. 838 (1) (348 SE2d 323) (1986).
The facts of this case are well-stated in the Court of Appeals’ opinion, see Emmons v. Burkett, supra, 179 Ga. App. at 838-840, and will be reiterated here only when necessary to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farmers Bank v. HubbardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Gurwitch v. Luxurest Furniture Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- First Galesburg National Bank & Trust Co. v. JoannidesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Reeves v. Habersham BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Spillers v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Cottam v. HeppnerUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Davis v. Concord Commercial Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- John P. Regan, Jr., Lois P. Regan v. U.S. Small Business Administration, Trust Company Bank of Augusta F/k/a the First National Bank of ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Victory Hills Ltd. Partnership I v. Nationsbank, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ruden v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.