Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Welch

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 17, 2004No. 03-453PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Appellant, Ford Motor Credit Company (“Ford”), commenced this action for a deficiency judgment following the sale of a repossessed automobile at private auction. The trial court denied Ford’s claim because it found that Ford had failed to provide the defendant debtor with notice of a right to redeem. We affirm.

¶ 2. In 1998, Matthew Welch purchased a used pickup truck and entered into a repayment agreement with Ford. The contract provided Ford with a security interest in the vehicle, and the right to repossess it if Welch failed to make timely payments. The contract further provided that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cabot v. CabotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Myott v. MyottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  4. Bergeron v. BoyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  5. Chittenden Trust Co. v. MaryanskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cascade Collections v. CorrayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API