Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Welch
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Appellant, Ford Motor Credit Company (“Ford”), commenced this action for a deficiency judgment following the sale of a repossessed automobile at private auction. The trial court denied Ford’s claim because it found that Ford had failed to provide the defendant debtor with notice of a right to redeem. We affirm.
¶ 2. In 1998, Matthew Welch purchased a used pickup truck and entered into a repayment agreement with Ford. The contract provided Ford with a security interest in the vehicle, and the right to repossess it if Welch failed to make timely payments. The contract further provided that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cabot v. CabotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Myott v. MyottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Bergeron v. BoyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Chittenden Trust Co. v. MaryanskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cascade Collections v. CorrayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025