Legal Opinion

Genesee Scrap & Tin Baling Co. v. City of Rochester

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 3, 2008No. 07-CV-6359LPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Genesee Scrap & Tin Baling Co., Inc. (“Genesee”), brought this action against the City of Rochester, New York (“City”), seeking a declaration by this Court that a particular ordinance enacted by the City is unconstitutional. On July 30, 2007, in open court, I denied Genesee’s motion for a preliminary injunction, in which Genesee sought to enjoin the City from enforcing the ordinance pending a final determination on the merits of plaintiffs claims. See Dkt. #11 and # 12.

Plaintiff has now moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Veazie Bank v. FennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tennessee Scrap Recyclers Ass'n v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Casciani v. NesbittDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  3. Tarantino v. City of HornellDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  4. Reyes v. Brown (In re Reyes)District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
  5. (PS) Lull v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API