Legal Opinion
Tarantino v. City of Hornell
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 18, 2009No. 05-CV-6587LPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Frederick Tarantino, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the City of Hornell, New York (sometimes “City”) and three City officials, asserting claims arising out of defendants’ enforcement of a City ordinance imposing certain requirements on the owners of rental properties within Hornell. Defendants have moved for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
At the time of the events giving rise to this lawsuit, plaintiff owned two rental properties in Hornell: a two-family unit at 175-177 River Street, and another two-family unit…
2Cases cited97 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Analytical Diagnostic Labs, Inc. v. KuselCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Mangino v. Incorporated Village of PatchogueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Casciani v. NesbittDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- JDC MANAGEMENT, LLC v. ReichDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Mann v. Calumet CityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.