Legal Opinion

(PS) Lull v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 10, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01020Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHRISTOPHER LULL, No. 2:18-cv-1020-MCE-EFB PS 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 This case was before the court on February 6, 2019, for hearing on defendants’ motion to 17 dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 18 12(b)(6).1 ECF No. 17. Attorney Jonathan Paul appeared on behalf of defendants, and plaintiff 19 appeared pro se. For the following reasons, it is recommended that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API