Legal Opinion
Barzetti v. Marucci
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 13, 2001No. AC 21446PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*803 Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendant, Maria Marucci, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion for permission to relocate the parties’ minor child. On appeal, she claims that (1) Ireland v. Ireland, 246 Conn. 413, 717 A.2d 676 (1998) (en banc), is the appropriate Supreme Court decision to guide the decision of this case, (2) the court improperly applied the decision in Ireland, (3) the court improperly failed to find that she had demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the relocation was for a legitimate purpose and (4) the court improperly denied her motion…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Duve v. DuveConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- In re Antonio M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Hurtado v. HurtadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- American Heritage Agency, Inc. v. GelinasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Swanson v. City of GrotonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- TOWN OF TRUMBULL v. PalmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Sandvig v. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Tulisano v. SchonbergerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Sweeney v. SweeneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.