Legal Opinion

Kipperman v. Proulx (In re Burns)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2002No. BAP Nos. SC-02-1020MaRyP, SC-02-1048-MaRyP; Bankruptcy No. 99-33191-B7; Adversary No. 01-90355PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARLAR, Bankruptcy Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The chapter 7 trustee (“Trustee”) has appealed the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment in favor of a judgment creditor, who served an Order to Appear for Examination (“ORAP”) on the judgment debtor and thus created a lien on his nonexempt personal property, under California law. Trustee maintains that the judgment creditor was required to serve a third-party ORAP because the property — a $150,000 settlement in federal district court litigation- — was still in the possession of the payor United States of America (“United States”) at the time. Within…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daly v. Deptula (In Re Carrozzella & Rechardson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API