Legal Opinion
White v. City of Manchester
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 28, 1955No. 35871PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
Merely “filing” an amendment without having it “allowed” by the court is not sufficient to constitute such purported amendment a part of the record in the case. Maxwell v. Cofer, 201 Ga. 222, 226 (39 S. E. 2d 314); Johnson v. Vassar, 143 Ga. 702 (85 S. E. 833). Accordingly, since it appears from the record that the court did not sign the order allowing the paper denominated “Third Amendment,” the fact that it bears the notation, “Filed in office June 18, 1955, A. D. Herring, Clerk,” is not sufficient to require its consideration as a part of the record in this case, and the sufficiency of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lane Drug Stores Inc. v. StoryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Maxwell v. CoferSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Johnson v. VassarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Banks v. Housing C. of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Wilson v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Herschel McDaniel Funeral Home, Inc. v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Auerbach v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. FlaniganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Harris v. BETHEL AIR CONDITIONING & ELECTRIC COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- 670 New Street, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.