Legal Opinion

Lane Drug Stores Inc. v. Story

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1945No. 31014PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The evidence fails to show negligence on the part of the defendant. The rule of law as to the duty of the ocbupier of premises to an invitee applies to hidden defects and to those not discoverable by the invitee by the exercise of ordinary care. Coffer v. Bradshaw, 46 Ga. App. 143 (167 S. E. 119); Day v. Trion Co., 56 Ga. App. 1 (192 S. E. 88); Lebby v. Atlanta Realty Corp., 25 Ga. App. 369 (103 S. E. 433). Therefore, in order to show negligence in this case, the plaintiff must show that she could not have seen the stool-in the exercise of ordinary care.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rollestone v. Cassirer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Coffer v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Lebby v. Atlanta Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Day v. Trion Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Glover v. City Council of AugustaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Alsup v. Saratoga Hotel, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ford v. S. A. Lynch CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Goldsmith v. HazelwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Slaughter v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API