Legal Opinion
670 New Street, Inc. v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 15, 1963No. 39871, 39872PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
It is fundamental, of course, and requires no reiteration of authority, that the petitions must be construed on demurrer most strongly against the plaintiffs. In so construing the petitions it may be conceded at the outset that under the facts alleged the defendant had the duty of exercising ordinary care in keeping the premises and approaches safe for the plaintiff’s use. Code § 105-401; Crossgrove v. Atlantic C. L. R. Co., 30 Ga. App. 462 (1) (118 SE 694); Camp v. Curry-Arrington Co., 49 Ga. App. 594 (1) (176 SE 49). However, if the plaintiff, Mrs. Smith, by the exercise of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Hill v. Davison-Paxon Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Southern Railway Co. v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Mansfield v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chotas v. J. P. Allen & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Auerbach v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Nesmith v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. ReddingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- McDaniel v. GossettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.