Legal Opinion

Banks v. Housing C. of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 20, 1949No. 32483PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for the housing authority rely on three general propositions as authority for sustaining the judgment of the trial court dis missing the action on general demurrer. These are: (1) A suit in tort cannot be maintained against the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta. (2) The petition does not show that the defendant knew that the ice was on the steps, or that it had been on the steps for such a length of time as to charge the defendant with' knowledge thereof. (3) The petition shows that the plaintiff in the exercise of ordinary care could have…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ball v. WalshSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Donehoe v. CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Aikin v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. National Bellas-Hess Co. v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Chotas v. J. P. Allen & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Hill v. Davison-Paxon Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Auerbach v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Ford v. S. A. Lynch CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API