Cregler v. Durham
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Oregler sued Durham and Anderson on a note reading thus:
“ Cincinnati, March 9, 1852. Six months after date we, or either of us, promise to pay, to the order of M. F. Cregler, 391 dollars and 14 cents, for value received. Anderson and Durham. $391.14.”
Anderson was not found. Dwrham answered, denying any indebtedness to Oregler, and denying the execution of the note.
Replication, that he was liable as a partner of Anderson, who executed the note.
Trial by jury, verdict for the defendant, and judgment on the verdict.
The facts appearing by the pleadings and special verdict are, that Durham and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Goble v. GaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
3Cited by5 opinions
- Uhl v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Stall v. CassadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Druck v. NicolaiOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Dawson v. PogueOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Dawson v. PogueOregon Supreme Court · 1888