Legal Opinion

Stall v. Cassady

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Erom the Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, C. J.

Suit upon a promissory note, against Thompson and Stall as makers. Answer, by Stall, of non est factum. Thompson made default. Trial by the court. Judgment for the plaintiff.. New trial denied. Appeal. Error assigned, overruling the motion for a new trial upon the evidence.

It appeared by the evidence, that William A. Thompson and Robert Stall were partners during the years 1871, 1872, and a part of 1873; that their office was in Indianapolis; that in the early part of 1873, Stoll retired from the firm, but gave no notice .whatever of the fact. At its date, the following note was given for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pratt v. PageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
  2. Ketcham v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  3. Hutchins v. Bank of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Cregler v. DurhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Hunt v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Preston v. FoellingerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1885
  2. Iddings v. PiersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API