Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 20, 2013No. 40811-2-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Johanson, A.C.J.
¶1 The primary substantive question before us is whether general supervisory care for a disabled individual qualifies as a covered medical assistance service *733under the federal Medicaid Act.1 Faith K. Freeman seeks Medicaid benefits for supervisory services her parents provided when she was 18 to 21 years old. We affirm the Department of Social and Health Services Board of Appeals (Board) and hold it did not err (1) in concluding that the Department of Social and Health Services (Department) timely invoked appellate jurisdiction, (2) in finding general supervisory care is not a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- S.D. Ex Rel. Dickson v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Caritas Services, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- In the Matter of Marriage of TangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pro-active Home Builders v. Washington State Department Of Labor And IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- In re the Dependency of A.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013