Legal Opinion

In re the Dependency of A.P.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 14, 2013No. 30925-8-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFearing, J.

¶1

INTRODUCTION AND RULING

¶2 The State of Washington, through the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), filed a petition alleging that the child A.R was a dependent of the State. DSHS asserted that A.P. was abused or neglected, as defined by *873the dependency statutes, and had no parent capable of caring for her. A.P.’s mother, B.P, successfully opposed the dependency and retained custody of her daughter. Upon a ruling in her favor from the superior court, B.P. sought an award of reasonable attorney fees and costs, under RCW 4.84.350, Washington’s equal access to justice act (WEAJA).…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Lowy v. PeaceHealthWashington Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Solvay Chemicals, Inc., V State Of Wa Dept. Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. Teague v. Healthcare Development Partners, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API