Legal Opinion
Fischer v. First National Bank
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1935No. 6089PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.
This action was instituted to recover damages for the alleged refusal of respondent bank to honor and pay a check drawn upon it by appellant. The allegations material to a consideration of the. questions involved are contained in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the complaint, which recite as follows :
“That from June 24, 1931, until June 29, 1931, plaintiff had on deposit, subject to his check, in said defendant bank a balance due and owing him of more than One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars. That on June 19, 1931, plaintiff drew his check on his said account with said defendant bank, in the sum of One…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Renner v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Simms v. SullivanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Nelson v. Southern Pacifc Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
- Luckehe v. First Nat. Bk. of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. McKinney v. RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Louis A. Sabatino, as Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Jose Juan D'agostino, Deceased v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co. v. PringleIdaho Supreme Court · 1935