Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1857PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Knox Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

The appellee was plaintiff and the appellants defendants below.

Stuart, J.

The complainant alleges that at the time of her marriage with Miller, she had about 175 dollars; that it was loaned out to one Raseman, payable to her in her former name of Fredericka Bur house; that it was collected after her marriage, and that Samuel Miller, her husband, had loaned the money to his co-defendants, Wilkins and others, and fraudulently taken the note payable to himself; that in further fraud of the plaintiff, he had assigned the note of Wilkins and Robinson to Greenup Miller, his son and co-defendant; and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barnett v. GoingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Henneger v. LomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Armacost v. LindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Greencastle Southern Turnpike Co. v. State ex rel. MalotIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Hileman v. HilemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Bennett v. BennettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API