Greencastle Southern Turnpike Co. v. State ex rel. Malot
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Putnam Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.
— Information under the code, (2 G. & H., § 749, clause 4, p. 322,) against the appellant to enforce an alleged forfeiture of its rights and privileges as a corporation. The company was incorporated under the act of May 12th, 1852, 1 G. & H., p. 474, for the purpose of constructing a macadamized road. The complaint is in two paragraphs. A demurrer was sustained to the first, and. overruled as to the second, and this latter ruling is assigned for error.
The question presented involves the validity of the fifth section of the act of February 28th, 1855, 1 G. & H. 487, which provides “that every…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Patton's Lessee v. EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Green v. Lessee of NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Langdon v. ApplegateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- Rockhill v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- State ex rel. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. County of WapelloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Blakemore v. DolanIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Bruns v. CopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Longlois v. LongloisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Niblack v. GoodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Taxpayers Lobby of Indiana, Inc. v. OrrIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.