Legal Opinion

Cattin v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1948No. 32335PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is an action for damages from surface water flooding plaintiff’s premises. Defendant moved for a directed verdict. The motion was overruled. The cause was submitted to a jury who returned a verdict for the plaintiff. Upon the overruling of motion for new trial, defendant appeals.

For convenience, the appellant will be referred to as the city and appellee as the plaintiff.

Due to considerable use of the words “Burt Street and Twenty-fifth Avenue,” the same will be referred to as “Twenty-fifth and Burt.”

The plaintiff predicates negligence on the part of *436the city substantially on the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. TreleavenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. Graessle v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Koyen v. Citizens National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pevear v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. " L" INVESTMENTS, LTD. v. LynchNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Elledge v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Hunt v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Young v. City of ScribnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API