Legal Opinion

Leseberg v. Lane

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1962No. 3046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Blume

This is an action to compel defendant Dora Robertson to turn over the sum of $17,226.96, the balance of a joint account, to the administratrix of the estate of Mary Butler, deceased, so that this sum should become a part of the estate of the deceased. The agreement for the joint account in question reads as follows:

“Joint Account — Payable to Either or Survivor
“We agree and declare that all funds now, or hereafter deposited in this account are, and shall be, our joint property and owned by us as joint tenants with right of survivorship, and not as tenants in common; and upon the death of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leedom v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Null's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Harrison v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Woolwine v. BryantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  5. Burns v. NemoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Bank of Newcastle v. WartellWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Matter of Estate of LoomisWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API