Woolwine v. Bryant
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.
Plaintiff-appellee is the grantor in a quitclaim deed executed in 1944. Defendants-appellants are the grantees, excepting Verle Bryant, who is the husband of defendant Daisy Bryant. This action is to cancel the deed and for an accounting, the petition alleging fraud, undue influence, mental incapacity and a breach of a confidential relationship existing between plaintiff and defendant Daisy Bryant. The trial court granted the relief prayed, basing its decree upon the sole ground of a breach of a confidential relationship. From that portion of the decree, which voided the deed, this appeal is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Curtis v. ArmagastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Merritt v. EasterlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Good v. ZookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
3Cited by19 opinions
- Menzel v. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- First National Bank in Sioux City v. CurranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Luse v. GrenkoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Burns v. NemoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Luebke v. FreimuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.