Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Loomis

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1991No. 90-231PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MACY, Justice.

Appellants Gerald James Whiting, Ray Whiting, Jack Wallis Whiting, Merrel Dere-mo, Bonnie J. Lutterman, and Hugh K. Loomis allege that Appellee William H. Vines unduly influenced Zona R. Loomis when she made her Last Will and Testament. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Vines.

We affirm.

Appellants raise the following issues for our review:

1. The Court erred in finding that there was no presumption of undue influence.

2. The Court erred in failing to consider the ethical matters involved.

3. The Court erred in denying that W.H. Vines was not a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Llewellyn v. CheesewrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Matter of Estate of ObraWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Peterson v. McMickenWyoming Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Breadheft v. ClevelandIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Zinnser v. GregorySupreme Court of Florida · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Retz v. SiebrandtWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Popejoy v. SteinleWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mercado v. TrujilloWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Melcher v. BensonWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API