Legal Opinion

Smith v. Golden State Hospital

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1931No. Docket No. 6519PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

Having received personal injuries resulting in disability during the course of his employment, appellant instituted proper proceedings and was allowed compensation and medical treatment under the provisions of the Work-' men’s Compensation and Safety Act (Stats. 1917, p. 831). Thereafter he filed an action against his employers and the hospital and physicians to whom he had been referred for medical and surgical treatment by the employers, praying damages for alleged permanent injuries subsequently incurred as a result of malpractice. Pending trial of the civil action, appellant was allowed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Viita v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Lincoln Park Coal & Brick Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Ruth v. Witherspoon-Englar Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Fauver v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  4. Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Fitzpatrick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API