Legal Opinion

Meriden Savings Bank v. Sujdak

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This action was for the foreclosure of two mortgages on real estate in Meriden and for a deficiency judgment, the first count of the complaint alleging a mortgage of March 15th, 1899, for $1500 to the plaintiff by Chapin and Christopher S. Howard and the second a mortgage to it of April 24th, 1923, for $7500 by Leonardo Suzio, hereinafter called the defendant except when otherwise indicated. The defendant appeared by counsel who joined in a “Stipulation as to Law Day.” Pursuant thereto by its judgment of June 4th, 1937, the court fixed June 14th, 1937, as the law day for the defendant owner…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PalkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Norwich Gas & Electric Co. v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Hoey v. Investors' Mortgage & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Mathews v. SheehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. Wilcox v. BlissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. LenczykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. City Sav. Bk of Bridgeport v. MikoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  3. Crane v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. Merry-Go-Round Enterprises, Inc. v. MolnarConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Bank of Stamford v. AlaimoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API