Legal Opinion

Merry-Go-Round Enterprises, Inc. v. Molnar

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 10, 1987No. 4054PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The plaintiff initiated foreclosure proceedings against the defendants in 1979. The defendants answered the plaintiff’s complaint and filed a counterclaim. The court subsequently granted the plaintiff’s motions for default and for nonsuit on the defendants’ counterclaim. Judgement of strict foreclosure was entered against the defendants on November 13,1984. No appeal was taken from the judgment and the law days passed, vesting absolute title in the plaintiff on January 14, 1985. On February 14, 1985, the defendants filed a motion to open the judgment of strict foreclosure and a motion to open…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. City Sav. Bk of Bridgeport v. MikoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  3. Hoey v. Investors' Mortgage & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Patry v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Connecticut Savings Bank v. HowesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Barclays Bank of New York v. IvlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. First National Bank of Chicago v. LueckenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Bank of Stamford v. AlaimoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Northeast Savings, F.A. v. HopkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API