Legal Opinion

Estate of Christensen v. Christensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1982No. 17892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

Appellant, who married the 83-year-old testator six weeks before his death, contends that she is entitled to 50 percent of his $10 million estate as an “omitted spouse” under U.C.A., 1953, § 75-2-301. She claims the intestate share specified where “a testator fails to provide by will for his surviving spouse who married the testator after the execution of the will. ... ” The district court granted the executor’s motion to dismiss appellant’s petition on the ground that she was not an omitted spouse because she was provided for in the testator’s will. (The court did not resolve…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rice v. Granite School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  2. JP Koch, Inc. v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Bridler v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Triple I Supply, Inc. v. Sunset Rail, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Estate of GanierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re Estate of William J. HannifinUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Marianne Waldow v. James LaportaArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Matter of Estate of KeevenIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Radman v. Flanders Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. In re Estate of HeaterUtah Supreme Court · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API