In re Estate of William J. Hannifin
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice LEE,
opinion of the Court:
T1 Max Hill, in his capacity as Special Representative of the Estate of William J. Hannifin, appeals from a district court order awarding Willis Nakai a portion of that estate. Though Nakai is neither biologically nor legally related to Hannifin, the district court determined that he was nonetheless entitled to inherit under the doctrine of equitable adoption. |
2 We'reverse. We hold that the doctrine of equitable adoption, first recognized in In re Williams' Estates, 10 Utah 2d 83, 348 P.2d 683 (1960), has been preempted by the detailed provisions of Utah's…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Bishop v. GenTec Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re the Estates of WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Monarrez v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. GoinsUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. RushtonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Craig v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Federated Capital Corp. v. LibbyUtah Supreme Court · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.