Legal Opinion

Marianne Waldow v. James Laporta

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2010No. CV-10-0102-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 An appeal may be taken “[f]rom a judgment, decree or order entered in any formal proceedings under title 14.” A.R.S. § 12-2101(J) (2003). The issue for decision is whether, in an unsupervised administration, an order requiring nonprobate transferees to pay a pro rata share of estate taxes is appealable under § 12 — 2101(J).

I

¶2 In April 2008, Marianne Waldow, the personal representative of the estate of Rosanne L. McGathy, filed a petition in the superior court seeking instructions on wheth er estate taxes should be paid solely from the estate or whether…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. Ivancovich v. MeierArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Schmidt v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Estate of Christensen v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Estate of Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Estate of Claudette SheltraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  5. In RE ESTATE OF McGATHYArizona Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API