Marianne Waldow v. James Laporta
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 An appeal may be taken “[f]rom a judgment, decree or order entered in any formal proceedings under title 14.” A.R.S. § 12-2101(J) (2003). The issue for decision is whether, in an unsupervised administration, an order requiring nonprobate transferees to pay a pro rata share of estate taxes is appealable under § 12 — 2101(J).
I
¶2 In April 2008, Marianne Waldow, the personal representative of the estate of Rosanne L. McGathy, filed a petition in the superior court seeking instructions on wheth er estate taxes should be paid solely from the estate or whether…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Ivancovich v. MeierArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Schmidt v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Estate of Christensen v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re the Estate of GeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Estate of Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Estate of Claudette SheltraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- In RE ESTATE OF McGATHYArizona Supreme Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.