Legal Opinion

McShea v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 2010No. 24 EAP 2007, 25 EAP 2007, 26 EAP 2007PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

From 1987 to 1994, appellants, a class of 12,000 current and former City of Philadelphia employees, participated in a voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan, deferring receipt of certain compensation which was deposited in various investments. The City’s Director of Finance administered the Plan and had authority to designate a third party to handle routine management. From 1984 to 1992, the Public Employees Benefit Services Corporation (PEBSCO) contracted with the City to serve as the Plan’s third party administrator.

PEBSCO charged an annual fee for its services, which…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Davis v. Wells Fargo, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Donaldson, K. v. Davidson Brothers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. 412 North Front Street Associates, LP v. Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Discover Bank v. StuckaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API