Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Multnomah County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 24, 1987No. 84-4122PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The petitions of plaintiffs-appellants and of appellees for rehearing are denied. This court’s previous opinion in this case, reported at 799 F.2d 1262 (9th Cir.1986), is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is filed as the opinion of the court in this case.
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-appellants represent the class of “all present and future pretrial detainees, and all present and future sentenced offenders within the Multnomah County [Oregon] justice system.” In 1982, we affirmed an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 to plaintiffs as prevailing parties in an action…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Juan Manuel Morales v. City of San Rafael and Daniel HulettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- H.N. Dang v. Gilbert CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United Steelworkers v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.