Harrison v. . Allen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Justice, J., at the December Term, 1909, of BirRKE. . The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
It was error to refuse the motion of the defendants to remove the cause to the United States Circuit Court. The petition and bond were filed in apt time. The court finds as a fact that the controversy is wholly between citizens of different States and wholly determinable between them. The court further finds that plaintiff, in his complaint, asks damages in the amount of $2,000 and a permanent injunction against defendants, and that defendants claim in their-petition for removal that the granting of this injunction will deprive them of property to the amount, of $3,000 over and above the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Smith v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Ayers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. McConnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1897
- Cowell v. City Water Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fields v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Smith v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933