Legal Opinion
Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 21, 1998No. Civil Action 96-1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
After eighteen days of trial, during which Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, Lithuanian Commerce Corp., and Additional Counterclaim Defendants, Algis Vasys and Laima Zajanekauskiene (collectively, “LCC”), presented twelve witnesses and more than 200 exhibits to the jury, Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, Sara Lee Hosiery, Sara Lee Hosiery International, Sara Lee International, and Sara Lee Corporation (collectively, “Sara Lee”), have moved for judgment as a matter of law on all of LCC’s claims, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a). 1 This…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Aloe Coal Company and Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Edward C. Denneny and Catherine Denneny v. Bernard Siegel, Louis H. Block and the Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- LITHUANIAN COMMERCE CORP. LTD. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002