Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nevada Building Authority v. Hancock

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1970No. 6157PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This proceeding in mandamus tests the constitutionality of ch. 448 [1969] Stats, of Nev. 778 in the light of Nev. Const. art. 9, § 3 limiting the public debts of Nevada to one percent of the assessed valuation of the State.

The relator, Nevada Building Authority, was created by the mentioned statute. It is designated therein as a body corporate and politic. Its members consist ex officio of the members of the State Planning Board, and the manager of the latter Board is the secretary of the Authority and the respondent to this proceeding.

The legislature through…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State Ex Rel. Public Institutional Building Authority v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. State Park & Recreation Commission v. New Mexico State AuthorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State Office Bldg. Commission v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Gude v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Business Computer Rentals v. State TreasurerNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In the Matter of Constitutionality of Chapter 280, Or. Laws 1975Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1976 Pa 240Michigan Supreme Court · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API