Legal Opinion

Lakeside Utilities Corp. v. Barnum

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1983No. 82-824PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

With his first proposition of law, appellant does not directly challenge the judgment of the courts below. Rather, he contends that the trial court improperly reached its decision by impermissively relying on an unreported opinion of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Appellant asserts that this is forbidden by R.C. 2503.20.2 However, appellant also challenges the substance of the trial court’s decision itself. Since we address this latter contention, the question of the reliance by the trial court upon an unreported appellate decision becomes moot. Consequently, we do not address it,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forest Hills Utility Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Forest Hills Utility Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Mohawk Utilities, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State ex rel. Gargallo v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Sparks v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shaw v. AberdeenOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API