Legal Opinion

In Re McAlear

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar has placed before us its recommendation that the defendant, who on September 11, 1940, was granted the privilege of practicing law in this state, be suspended from the privilege for six months. The recommendation is made by eight of the twelve members of the board. One member for sound reasons deemed himself disqualified. Three others declined to concur in the recommendation. Their views are unknown to us.

The complaint against the defendant contains four counts:

The first alleges that the defendant, in a cause in which he represented two elderly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte FinnOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Grievance Committee v. WoerndleOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State Ex Rel. Joseph v. MannixOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State ex rel. Montgomery v. EstesOregon Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KrausOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API