Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Grievance Committee v. Woerndle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOUET, J.

This is a disbarment proceeding. The members of the Grievance Committee of the State Bar Association and the members of the Grievance Committee and Chancellors of the Multnomah Bar Association join in presenting and prosecuting the accusation against the defendant.

By a demurrer interposed thereto, defendant asserts that the facts alleged in the accusation do not disclose any legal grounds for his disbarment.

*464It is alleged in the accusation that the defendant was horn in Germany in the year 1880, and came to this country in the year 1897, and was on the twenty-third day of August, 1904, hy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  3. United States v. MoreheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. United States v. SmullSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. State v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Application of TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. The Florida Bar v. McCainSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MeansOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LenskeOregon Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API