Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Public Service Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The important question presented on these appeals which in our view of the cases makes it unnecessary to consider any others is: Does sec. 31.14, Stats., confer upon the Public Service Commission the jurisdiction to determine and regulate the common-law rights of all riparian owners to the use of nonsurplus water in a navigable stream? To determine this question requires a construction of sec. 31.14 which heretofore has not been construed. The primary source of construing the statute is the language of the statute itself. Sec. 31.14 is set forth in part in the footnote. 1
Sub. (1) of sec.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Muench v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- State ex rel. Raymer v. CunninghamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Larson v. LesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. ReslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Omernik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Labor & Farm Party v. Elections BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.