Legal Opinion
MICHAEL J. WARNER v. UNITED STATES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 2015No. 12-CM-1593PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Michael Warner was charged by information with misdemeanor second-degree fraud. 1 After a bench trial, the trial judge acquitted him of that charge but found him guilty of attempted second-degree theft, 2 which the judge concluded is a lesser included offense of second-degree fraud. On appeal, Warner argues that attempted second-degree theft is not included in second-degree fraud, and that, in any event, the evidence and the judge’s findings were insufficient to support his conviction of attempted theft. We hold that attempted second-degree theft by means of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bennett v. KigginsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- United States v. Mark AlfisiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Crawford v. Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Crawford v. Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Lee Carrell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.