Legal Opinion
Harju v. Anderson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1925No. 19030. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
On August 5, 1916, the respondent began an action in tort in 'the superior court for Wah-kiakum county against the appellant and the defendants William Anderson and William Anderson Com pany. Summons and complaint were served upon the defendants William Anderson and William Anderson Company, who appeared and filed demurrers and affidavits of prejudice whereby a change of venue was secured to Cowlitz county on September 29, 1916, in which county, on May 22, 1917, an order was entered sustaining the demurrers. On November 26, 1917, an attempt was made in Wahkiakum county to serve the summons…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dobson v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Murray v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1876
- Harju v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Aultman, Miller & Co. v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Bailey v. WilsonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Junghans v. JunghansCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Tomkins v. TomkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Mabson v. MabsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942