Legal Opinion

Harju v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1923No. 17693PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendant, Anderson, seeks vacation of a default judgment rendered against him in favor of the plaintiff, Harju, in the superior court for Cowlitz county. This proceeding is by petition and notice entitled and filed in the action in which the judgment was rendered, and is prosecuted under §§ 464, 467 and 468, Rem. Comp. Stat. [P. C. §§ 8180, 8133, 8134]. The proceeding comes to this court upon appeal by Anderson from orders of the superior court quashing services of notices, accompanied by his petition, upon Harju and his attorneys at Astoria, Oregon.

*162The judgment which Anderson seeks to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturgiss v. DartWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State ex rel. Post v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. In re the Adoption of ForceWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Roberts v. Shelton Southwestern RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Meeker v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pike v. PikeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Heuchan v. HeuchanWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Miller v. SchlerethNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Keane v. AllenIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. Hibler v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API