Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Berry

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 12, 1993No. 69,269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Plaintiff Thomas Ellis appeals the trial court’s decision finding he was not entitled to judgment against defendant Joan Berry. Ellis also appeals the court’s decision that his case was frivolous and the resulting order that Ellis bear all costs and fees.

Ellis and Berry met in Florida in 1987. In September 1987, Berry accepted a highly paid position at Hallmark in Kansas City. Ellis quit his job and moved to Kansas City to live with Berry. Ellis was unable to find work immediately, so he took responsibility for household chores. Ellis and Berry lived rent-free in a condominium…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mai v. YoutseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. In Re Estate of RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Minnesota Avenue, Inc. v. Automatic Packagers, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Smith v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Caylor v. CastoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lindsey Masonry Co. v. Murray & Sons Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
  2. Lindsey Masonry Co. v. Murray & Sons Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
  3. MidAmerica Division Inc. v. First Health Group Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API