Legal Opinion

Lindsey Masonry Co. v. Murray & Sons Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 3, 2017No. 114812Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 114,812 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS LINDSEY MASONRY CO., Appellee, v. MURRAY & SONS CONSTRUCTION CO. and THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Appellants. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. To form a binding contract, there must be a meeting of the minds on all essential elements. Contract formation requires an unconditional and positive acceptance. A conditional acceptance is really a counteroffer and no contract is formed. 2. An acceptance of a contract must mirror the terms of the offer. A conditional acceptance is a counteroffer that rejects the original offer. 3. When one party…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Allegri v. Providence-St. Margaret Health CenterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  3. Haz-Mat Response, Inc. v. Certified Waste Services Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. Unified School District No. 233 v. Kansas Ass'n of American EducatorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API