Legal Opinion

Lindsey Masonry Co. v. Murray & Sons Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 3, 2017No. 114812PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

This is an appeal by Murray & Sons Construction Company of the trial court’s holding that it had breached an implied-in-fact contract with Lindsey Masonry Company by not paying for all of die services performed. Along with the contract payments, the trial court awarded interest, costs, and attorney fees as authorized by the Kansas Fairness in Public Construction Contracts Act. Our review of the extensive record leads us to conclude that we must affirm the judgments of the trial court.

With no signed contracts, a general contractor and a masonry company work together on several public…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Allegri v. Providence-St. Margaret Health CenterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  3. Unified School District No. 233 v. Kansas Ass'n of American EducatorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Unified School District No. 446 v. SandovalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Monarch Build v. DLH HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
  2. Law Co. Building Associates v. LawCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  3. EST Inc. v. Royal-Grow Products, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  4. Hampton v. Barclays Bank DelawareDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  5. Icon Structures, Inc. v. 84 Lumber Company, L.P.District Court, D. Kansas · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API